LLM 价格对比 — 为你的项目找到合适的 AI 模型。
免费的 AI 模型成本计算器。对比 300+ 生产级 LLM 的价格、上下文窗口、基准测试和功能特性。
- 追踪 330+ 款 AI 模型，每月更新。
- 使用通俗易懂的标签 — 不讲技术术语。
- 一键分享你的对比结果。
数据一览
截至 April 2026，Buzzi.ai 价格数据库中最便宜的生产级 AI 模型是 Arcee AI: Trinity Large Preview，每百万输入 Token 仅 $0.00。我们每日更新，持续追踪 330 款模型的价格、质量基准、上下文窗口与数据合规信息。
How it works
Three quick questions. A real cost number in return.
No sign-up, no spreadsheet, no jargon. Built for founders, product teams, and engineers who need an answer in under a minute.
- 01
Pick a scenario.
Tell us what you want AI to do — chat, code, extract data, understand images, reason, or bulk processing. We filter the model list to what matters.
- 02
Set your usage.
Share a rough sense of volume and message length. No tokens, no math — plain English with anchors like "a side project" or "production scale."
- 03
Compare real costs.
Every model card shows your personalized monthly cost. Side-by-side bars surface the cheapest pick and how much you’d save by switching.
What we track
One database. Every provider worth watching.
330 production-ready models across 54 providers — pricing, context window, benchmarks, regions, and compliance on every row. Refreshed each morning from official pricing pages, cross-checked against third-party aggregators.
Production-ready models
330
tracked
Providers covered
54
worldwide
Quality benchmarks
1
per model
Refresh cadence
Daily
price sync
All providers
- OpenAI55
- Qwen45
- Google31
- Mistral22
- Meta14
- Anthropic14
- Z.ai13
- NVIDIA10
- DeepSeek10
- xAI10
- MiniMax8
- Arcee AI7
- Nous Research6
- Amazon5
- Sao10K5
- Baidu5
- Perplexity5
- OpenRouter4
- Moonshot AI4
- Cohere4
- ByteDance Seed4
- TheDrummer4
- Aion Labs4
- Liquid AI3
- Xiaomi3
- Microsoft2
- Reka AI2
- Allen AI2
- Morph2
- Relace2
- Inflection2
- Cognitive Computations1
- IBM1
- Gryphe1
- Alibaba1
- ByteDance1
- StepFun1
- Nex AGI1
- Tencent1
- Essential AI1
- Upstage1
- Prime Intellect1
- Inception1
- Kwaipilot1
- TNG1
- Undi951
- Writer1
- Mancer1
- AlfredPros1
- Switchpoint1
- Deep Cogito1
- AI21 Labs1
- Anthracite1
- Alpindale1
Priced today
The latest flagship model from every major lab.
Prices are per 1 million tokens. Cached and batched rates apply when you reuse prompts or accept a delay. Click a row to open the full model page.
Top 3 priced models per provider by list price. Prices refreshed daily from each provider’s public pricing page.
Built for every workload
Pick your use case, get a focused shortlist.
Each scenario maps to models that were built — or tuned — for that job. Skip the ones that don’t fit.
- Chatbot or assistant
Answer questions, hold conversations, help users.
- Customer support bot
- FAQ assistant for your docs
- Write or review code
Generate, debug, or explain code in any language.
- Autocomplete in an IDE
- Agentic coding workflows
- Summarize or extract info
Pull key facts from long documents, emails, or transcripts.
- Invoice & PDF parsing
- Structured data from email
- Understand images
Describe photos, read screenshots, analyze charts.
- Screenshot-to-ticket
- Product photo tagging
- Complex reasoning or math
Multi-step thinking, logic, research, planning.
- Complex math & planning
- Multi-step research agents
- Bulk or batch processing
Classify, tag, or process thousands of items cheaply.
- Batch summarization
- Overnight classification jobs
Beyond sticker price
Five calculators that sit behind the main flow.
Once you’ve narrowed down, dig deeper — migration math, real-prompt costs, curated stacks, lifecycle risk, and compliance.
Switch cost calculator
Before you migrate, see how migration engineering hours weigh against the monthly savings over 12 months.
Prompt cost
Paste a real prompt and reply. Get a per-provider cost at today’s rates, tokenized with the right family coefficient.
Model stacks
Editorial picks for budget, balanced, and frontier use — curated by our applied-AI team, refreshed monthly.
Lifecycle timeline
Which models are sunsetting, when, and what the provider is pushing customers toward.
Compliance matrix
Regions and certifications (SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR, FedRAMP) per provider, in one grid.
FAQ
Questions we get asked most.
Pricing freshness, sourcing, cache and batch discounts, embedding, alerts — all the things teams ask before picking a model.
Get instant answers from our AI agent
As of April 2026, the lowest input $/1M on our comparison is Arcee AI: Trinity Large Preview. Real-world cost depends on your cache hit rate and batch eligibility.
We mirror pricing from official provider pricing pages and docs. Each model row has a "last verified" timestamp and a link to the source so you can check yourself.
A nightly snapshot cron diffs against the previous day. When a change is detected we log it and email subscribed users within 24 hours.
Models that offer cached input pricing get a separate column. The volume calculator multiplies your cache hit rate by the cached price and the rest by the standard input price.
Providers that support async batch endpoints usually list a reduced price. If a model row has a batch price, you can set the "batch eligible" slider to model cost savings for that workload share.
Our top recommendation: pick two candidates from the filtered shortlist, estimate break-even with the switch-cost calculator, and run your real prompts through "Compare my prompt" for a grounded test. Top 3 this month: Arcee AI: Trinity Large Preview, Auto Router, Body Builder (beta).
Yes. The comparison, calculators, and public JSON API are free. Signing in with Google enables the "Compare my prompt", saved comparisons, and price alerts features.
We list the top open-weight models (Meta Llama, Mistral, DeepSeek) when a pay-per-token API exists. Self-host cost modeling is not included since it depends on your GPU inventory.
Yes — the /embed route renders a minimal iframe with attribution. Use the embed builder on the main page to generate the snippet.
After signing in you can subscribe to any model. When the nightly snapshot detects a price change or deprecation, you get an email within 24 hours.
Each task has a weighted score over benchmarks relevant to that task plus a price pillar. We publish the exact weights on the methodology page.
No. The ranking is not pay-to-play. Providers pay us nothing.