AI use case
AI-generated content â US AI compliance
Generative content triggers state laws focused on deepfakes, voice/likeness rights, and political-ad disclosure. Tennessee ELVIS protects voice and likeness; Michigan and Florida regulate political deepfakes; Utah requires disclosure on request.
State-by-state breakdown
| Jurisdiction | Law | Effective | Max penalty |
|---|---|---|---|
| California consumers; businesses subject to CCPA | California AB 1008 â CCPA AI Inferences | 2026-01-01 | $7,500 |
| Florida consumers; political advertising; healthcare | Florida AI Transparency Act | 2026-07-01 | $5,000 |
| Michigan political communications | Michigan AI Political Advertising Act | 2025-02-01 | $1,000 |
| Tennessee residents (voice and likeness rights) | Tennessee ELVIS Act | 2024-07-01 | $25,000 |
| Utah consumers | Utah AI Policy Act | 2024-05-01 | $5,000 |
Headline obligations for ai-generated content
- voice/likeness rights
- political deepfake
- disclosure on request
Frequently asked questions about ai-generated content compliance
Which states regulate ai-generated content?
0 jurisdictions: California consumers; businesses subject to CCPA, Florida consumers; political advertising; healthcare, Michigan political communications, Tennessee residents (voice and likeness rights), Utah consumers.
What is the maximum penalty exposure?
Per-violation maximum: $25,000. Aggregate exposure depends on consumer counts and per-violation multiplication; engage counsel for a tailored estimate.
What are the headline obligations?
voice/likeness rights, political deepfake, disclosure on request.
Run the matrix for your full posture
Map every law that applies to your AI systems â not just ai-generated content â in 5 minutes.
Run the matrix