AI Readiness ┬╖ Healthcare
Where does your hospital, health system, or digital-health company stand on AI readiness? Our 35-question benchmark is adapted to clinical data, PHI, and FDA SaMD considerations.
What we reference
Sector-specific overlays on top of the generic 35-question bank тАФ so the findings speak the language your healthcare reviewers already use.
Questions and recommendations reflect Safe Harbor / Expert Determination, BAA requirements, and PHI access controls for AI pipelines.
Governance items reference post-market surveillance and SaMD classification when relevant.
Every recommendation maps to Govern / Map / Measure / Manage and ISO clauses.
Sample questions
HereтАЩs the kind of thing youтАЩll answer in the healthcare bank. Full assessment is 3├Ч longer тАФ still under 10 minutes.
Can PHI be de-identified to HIPAA Safe Harbor or Expert Determination standards for AI development?
Is there a BAA-backed LLM gateway that clinical staff can use without PHI leaving your tenancy?
Do you maintain a live inventory of AI systems (internal + vendor) mapped to patient-impact risk and FDA SaMD class?
These are samples. The real assessment adapts follow-ups based on your answers.
FAQ
Yes тАФ the healthcare bank explicitly includes PHI de-identification, BAAs, and documented classification questions, and recommendations are tagged to HIPAA sections where relevant.
Yes тАФ governance items reference post-market surveillance and SaMD classification. We do not give legal advice, but the framework mapping makes compliance conversations easier to structure.
Healthcare mid-size (51-200 and 201-1000 employees) peer benchmarks cover all five pillars when we have at least 30 completed assessments in that segment.
Healthcare bank
Sector overlays apply automatically. The result is a score, a peer benchmark and the three moves you can make this quarter тАФ tagged to the frameworks your reviewers already track.