AI use case
AI in healthcare — US AI compliance
Healthcare AI sits at the intersection of state AI laws and HIPAA. Florida requires AI disclosure in patient communications. Utah requires proactive disclosure in regulated occupations including medical. Colorado classifies clinical decision-support AI as high-risk. Sensitive PHI processing extends most obligations.
State-by-state breakdown
| Jurisdiction | Law | Effective | Max penalty |
|---|---|---|---|
| Colorado residents; deployers operating in CO | Colorado AI Act | 2026-06-30 | $20,000 |
| Colorado | Colorado SB 25-318 (CAIA Amendment) | 2026-08-30 | $20,000 |
| Florida consumers; political advertising; healthcare | Florida AI Transparency Act | 2026-07-01 | $5,000 |
| Texas residents; deployers operating in TX | Texas Responsible AI Governance Act | 2026-01-01 | $25,000 |
| Utah consumers | Utah AI Policy Act | 2024-05-01 | $5,000 |
Headline obligations for ai in healthcare
- patient disclosure
- PHI overlap
- risk management
- impact assessment
Frequently asked questions about ai in healthcare compliance
Which states regulate ai in healthcare?
2 jurisdictions: Colorado residents; deployers operating in CO, Colorado, Florida consumers; political advertising; healthcare, Texas residents; deployers operating in TX, Utah consumers.
What is the maximum penalty exposure?
Per-violation maximum: $25,000. Aggregate exposure depends on consumer counts and per-violation multiplication; engage counsel for a tailored estimate.
What are the headline obligations?
patient disclosure, PHI overlap, risk management, impact assessment.
Run the matrix for your full posture
Map every law that applies to your AI systems — not just ai in healthcare — in 5 minutes.
Run the matrix